Finding pre-seed investors in the UK when you don’t know anyone
Find UK pre-seed angels and funds through public sources. Check stage, cheque size and recent deals before building your shortlist.
By Ludovica De Pieri
Find UK pre-seed angels and funds through public sources. Check stage, cheque size and recent deals before building your shortlist.
By Ludovica De Pieri

Research checked 29 October 2026.
To find pre-seed investors in the UK without a network, start with public application routes, angel networks and the investors named in relevant company funding announcements. Check each investor’s stage, geography and likely cheque before adding them to your list. Then read several announced investments to find a concrete reason your company belongs in the conversation. An application route gives you somewhere to send your case; it doesn’t guarantee a response.
Key takeaways
- Build a shortlist from evidence you can open again, rather than a list of famous names.
- Record the fund’s cheque separately from the total round it joined.
- An adjacent portfolio company gives you a research lead. A possible direct competitor needs a closer check.
Write down the buyer, problem, product, location and next milestone before searching. The funding stage map helps you describe the work your round should fund. These details make investor research much less vague.
Here’s a hypothetical example: “We’re a Manchester team building scheduling software for independent dental practices. A working prototype is being tested by three practices. We need capital to test whether practices will pay and keep using it.” This is a research description, not a claim that three testers are enough to raise.
It gives you several things to look for: practice software, small business workflows, early product risk and UK investment eligibility. Searching only for “healthtech investors” could include investors focused on drug development, medical devices or much later businesses. Those might be poor matches for this particular company.
Keep the description short enough to put beside every investor name. If you can’t explain the connection in plain language, mark it as uncertain rather than filling the gap with enthusiasm.
Use sources that show who invests and how to approach them. Start with company announcements in your area, investor websites, and angel network directories. A directory supplies candidates; the investor’s own material supplies the next check.
For example, find a software company serving a similar buyer, open its funding announcement and note the named participants. Follow those names back to their own websites. A fund listed in an announcement might have joined a later round, so check what it actually does before treating it as a pre-seed candidate.
Angels and funds are different sources of capital. An angel invests their own money; a fund invests capital it manages. British Business Bank’s equity finance guide explains the distinction. For your research sheet, that means separate questions: can this individual invest the amount you need, or does this fund’s mandate fit your company?
Don’t assume an angel network itself writes the cheque. Look for the network’s explanation of screening, membership and investment decisions. If it isn’t clear, record the uncertainty before spending time on an application.
Use the route the investor publishes. If there’s a founder application form, read its requirements before drafting a long email.
On 29 October 2026, Seedcamp’s website displayed a “Pitch Us” route. That is a useful starting point for a founder without an introduction. It is evidence of a public submission route, not evidence that every submission receives a meeting.
Your research sheet could record “website application, checked 29 October” beside Seedcamp. For another investor it might say “applications open only during cohort window” or “no founder submission route found”. Those are three different situations. Don’t manufacture a partner’s email address to make the third look like the first.
If a fund asks for a short form, complete it clearly. Sending a separate message to every partner can create duplicate work without adding evidence to your case.
Our suggested research method is to read at least three announced investments, and more where the evidence is thin. This is an editorial method for organising your work, not a proven threshold for fundraising success.
For each announcement, record four things:
Keep “total round” and “individual cheque” in different fields. A £3 million round could have several investors. Unless the announcement discloses the split, you don’t know what any one investor contributed.
Now add your inference in a separate sentence. For the hypothetical scheduling company: “This fund backed early software selling into owner-operated businesses; I should check whether healthcare practice software fits its mandate.” That is a research hypothesis. It doesn’t become a fact because it sounds plausible.
Seedcamp announced that it led Vessla’s $3.3 million pre-seed round on 19 October 2026. The business works on property operations. See the fund’s announcement.
A founder building software for a different operational workflow could use that announcement as a starting point. The useful question is specific: what work does the customer need completed, and how does this product fit into the systems they already use?
That doesn’t mean all workflow companies fit Seedcamp. It means there is a real investment to examine instead of opening with “I admire your portfolio.” The Seedcamp Teardown examines three selected announcements and the limits of what you can infer from them.
For your own shortlist, write the portfolio company’s name, the connection and the difference. If the difference is more substantial than the connection, keep researching.
SEIS and EIS can matter to UK angel investors, but a tax scheme is not a promise that your company or a particular investment qualifies. HMRC explains that company and investor conditions both apply, and advance assurance is limited to the information and conditions it covers. See HMRC’s advance assurance guidance.
For a research sheet, useful fields are “SEIS/EIS preference stated by investor” and “company position checked with adviser”. Keep them separate. An investor saying they prefer SEIS companies does not establish your eligibility.
This is general educational information. Ask a qualified accountant or lawyer about your company’s circumstances before describing an investment as eligible.
A useful shortlist explains why each name is there. Use a compact record:
For the hypothetical practice software business, an investor might be worth further research because it backs early UK software and understands small business distribution. Another might come off the list because its published minimum cheque is larger than the whole proposed round. Neither decision requires knowing a partner personally.
Use the pre-seed fundraising plan to put that research alongside your cash and milestone decisions. Review the list before writing. “Famous investor” is not a reason. “Relevant investment, suitable stage, suitable cheque and an open route” is something you can check.
Explain what you build, why this investor is relevant, what evidence you have and what you’re asking for. Keep the portfolio reference accurate. A shared buyer or workflow is stronger than simply sharing the word “AI”.
For a hypothetical message, the opening could explain that you noticed an investment in practice management and that your company tackles a separate scheduling problem for the same buyer. The next sentence should establish the difference, so you don’t imply you’re asking the fund to back a direct substitute.
The cold email guide shows how to turn that research into a first line. Your job at this stage is to have a reason worth writing about.
Before you send anything, open one row of your list. Can you show the source for the stage, distinguish cheque from round, and explain the portfolio connection? If a field is blank, that is your next research task.
Persephone, the investor-matching tool for UK and EU founders, helps organise investor research and drafts first emails from the three closest deals a fund has done. You review the draft and send it yourself.
Researched and drafted with AI assistance. Approved by Ludovica De Pieri.
Newsletter
Your weekly, one-minute read on the latest news and updates across the ecosystem.
See which VCs match your startup — instant scan, no credit card required.
Try the free scan